Qutbi Anarchy – Teaching Followers that Pradhan Mantri Narendra Modi Is Like Hitler

Dear Mr. Qutbuddin,

I am writing to you again regarding a video that I saw on You Tube of an indoctrination lesson being given by your eminent Prince, Taher Khuzaima Qutbuddin to your very few followers via the internet. At the end of his lengthy lesson, one of your Qutbi followers, a certain Abizer, asks him why people believe in Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS and aren’t believing in you. Taher, your eldest son, has been widely rumored to be next in line in your Qutbi Dawat since all current relayed waez’s from your FatemiDawat website are of him from his living room in Bakersfield California. Others are saying that since it is very difficult to understand you, your followers requested that Taher’s waez’s be relayed instead of yours so the youngsters in your religious organization could be indoctrinated more easily. In any case, Taher offers a lengthy answer in which he says that fear is the main factor why people haven’t flocked to your cause. This video was back in April, so I guess you know by now that of course that isn’t true and it is love and devotion to Burhanuddin Moula RA and Mufaddal Moula TUS why people have been scared of you and not followed your call to anarchy. In his answer, Taher then goes on to say that people choose to believe in all sorts of wrong things even when they know that they are wrong. He goes on to give the example of Kufa and Imam Husain SA, explaining how history is full with people having followed the wrong side and having accepted tyranny. He explains that Hitler also killed so many people and how something as horrendous as the holocaust happened only sixty years ago while people watched by and let it happen. While his example of Hitler is true and the world went to war for those actions, Taher then goes on to say that the current Prime Minister, Narendra Modi (this video was in April), is also like Hitler because he massacred so many Muslims in Gujarat, and turned neighbor against neighbor. He says that history shows that people have been on the wrong side and followed a tyrant and points out that this occurred with Modi only 10 years ago. And then he says, “now they want to make him the Prime Minister.” The video I found where he insinuates these allegations is posted above.

Respected Prime Minister Modi paying his respects to Burhanuddin Moula RA and recently also to his Janisheen, Mufaddal Moula TUS.

I wanted to remind you that Prime Minister Modi had wonderful relations with our late Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. He paid a lot of respect to Burhanuddin Moula RA and often came to many of our miqats and even to Saifee Mahal to pay that respect and foster a relationship of honor and love for our Moula RA and in turn for our community, the Dawoodi Bohras. Aqa Moula RA also had foreseen the potential and ingenuity that President Modi possessed and today he would have been very happy that he has become the Prime Minister of India because of the new horizons to which he will take India. The Prime Minister has previously demonstrated such a successful record in his reformation of the infrastructure and economy of Gujarat and because of him, Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Jains, and all Indians of every religion and creed have prospered. He will bring his success and vision to the country and hopefully move India to the top of the global community. So when Burhanuddin Moula RA paid so much respect and admired Prime Minister Modi, why would Taher liken him to Hitler, especially in a religious indoctrination lesson which he broadcasted on the internet? Again, why is the Qutbi ideology so different than what we were taught to espouse under Burhanuddin Moula RA. Are Qutbis generally indoctrinated to be anarchists?

Burhanuddin Moula RA always taught us to be loyal to the country that we live in and to support the government for its betterment so that it can help all people and Mumineen through its own prosperity. Furthermore, because of the respect and relation that was fostered between Burhanuddin Moula RA and the current Pradhan Mantri, Narenda Modi, much honor and respect has come to the Dawoodi Bohra community. Why would you and Prince Taher choose to damage that by your hurtful and unproven allegations? Why would you choose to openly insult the Prime Minister (who was not in office yet at the time of the video) and demonstrate so much animosity to him? It seems that you are not only brewing anarchy within the Dawoodi Bohra community with your new religion but also within the Indian government. Are these the actions of a peace loving community? I hope that someone from your family can reply soon. We have been waiting for someone to come and answer the questions on this website.

Warmest Regards,

Farazdaq

The Height Of Qutbi Hypocrisy

A Letter From The Royal Qutbi Prince, Taher bin Khuzaima Qutbuddin of Bakersfield

Dear Mr. Qutbuddin,

I hope you are doing well. I was compelled to send in this letter to you after some of the comments which have been posted on this website by your diehard followers. My sincere query to you is regarding a letter which was supposedly written by your eldest son Taher who is currently residing in Bakersfield and often appears on your website where his waez is relayed from his living room because it is easier for most of your followers to understand him since it is difficult to follow what you say in your current medical condition. I understand this choice of yours to put Taher in the limelight and try to garner support for him as he very well may be your successor and since your health may not be what it use to be. But what I don’t understand is that it seems that Taher has interpreted a different ideology from you some years back that is different than what was purported on the Fatemi Dawat website. I will point out what I am trying to say in the following –

• The letter is almost 13 years old and has excerpts from a sabak you gave on the ‘urs of Syedna Tayib Zainuddin.
• The main point of the letter is that you say that in Zuhoor the ritual of proskynesis was given to Imam and so in satr it should also be given to Dai considering the maqam in which Imamuz Zaman has placed him.
• You go on to say (according to Prince Taher) that while it is necessary to accept and honor the positions below the Dai (Mazoon and Mukasir), the positions which the Dai has established, the ritual of proskynesis should only be done for the Dai.
• You then say that if someone hurls obscenities at the Dai, keeps enmity with him, then they will suffer ill-fortune. An enemy of the Dai cannot seek salvation from him and they will have the worse of punishments in the afterlife.
• You also mention that it is an article of faith to do baraat with the enemies of the Dai (cut off communications with them)  and that walayat cannot be considered complete unless you have done baraat.

So, Mr. Qutbuddin, what I don’t understand is that throughout your career as the Mazoon your children openly performed the ritual of proskynesis to you. Aqa Moula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA put a stop to this amal and it was no longer allowed – this is a known fact. In fact, this is exactly why Prince Taher wrote this letter – to ensure that he affirmed that ideology and concurred that one is not allowed to offer proskynesis to the mazoon and it is an amal reserved solely for the Dai. This much is said in the letter – that Mazoon and Mukasir should be respected and honored but not given sajdo.

Therefore, if you maintained that this amal could only be performed for the Dai, then why were you allowing it to be done for you? I have seen your children and diwaans performing this amal for you in Karachi many times.  Secondly, if you somehow maintain that you were next in line to be Dai and that is why you allowed this amal for yourself, you have said many times on your website and elsewhere that your private nass without witnesses was suppose to remain a secret and no one was suppose to know because ‘talwar chali jaate.’ I hope you do understand the contradiction in your actions and statements. If you were Burhanuddin Moula’s RA mansoos then he surely would have indicated that we perform this amal for you publicly for Mumineen. He never has once told Mumineen to do this in any bayan  – ever.

If it was suppose to be a secret it should have only been done in private.  I saw you accepting this amal to be done to you many times in Karachi and elsewhere, almost as if it was being forced. Therefore, it seems to me that you were doing this amal openly on your own and this is why there was a stop put to it. Otherwise, why would something right be stopped? Furthermore, the fact that Taher Qutbuddin wrote this letter is further proof that he had to openly state that  improper protocol being followed with the amal. Obviously if you were only suppose to announce that you were the mansoos at the right time, as you have maintained, you were announcing it all these years with your amal in public and that is contradictory to what you have been saying all along about keeping it a secret. Why such a blatant contradiction of statements? Why didn’t Burhanuddin Moula RA ever tell us to perform this amal for you if you were truly his mansoos? And if you were keeping the so called nass a secret, logic mandates that you would never have allowed your children and close relatives to do this in public. In fact, when people asked them they would maintain that they were just kissing the ground at your feet which was not sajdo but another amal. Were they lying at the time? Did you tell them to lie?

Secondly, after articulating that it is an article of the faith to not hurl obscenities or blasphemous statements at the Dai, why was this the first amal that you did when Burhanuddin Moula RA passed away. You opened a website that hurled blasphemous statements and obscenities at the 53rd Dai Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. Okay – lets say that you personally didn’t accept Moula TUS as the Dai. But you also didn’t do anything for three years after all Dawoodi Bohras had time to accept Mufaddal Moula TUS after nass was done on him. So you let everyone accept him as the Dai in their hearts, then after Burhanuddin Moula’s RA wafaat you came out and did dushmani and hurled obscenities such as calling him a wahabi, misogynist anti-woman suppressor, etc. etc. You knew what this would mean to the community and the 99.5 % of Dawoodi Bohras and what repercussions it would have. But you still chose to do it anyways. This is what I call fitnat because you must have anticipated the reaction of the Dawoodi Bohra community when you hurled insults at the 53rd Dai Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS openly all over the internet during the funeral procession and subsequent memorial services.

Then when baraat was done to you – according to the tenets of the faith which you uphold in the letter above – you ran to the newspapers to display what a wrong act it was and how it was unfair to you and your handful of followers. You demonstrated to your followers that the Dawoodi Bohras were acting irrationally and that the fact that they did baraat of you was such a wrong action. However, in this letter of Taher you have clearly stated that doing baraat with people who display enmity and hurl obscenities to the Dai is an article of faith. So I guess the question is why, Mr. Qutbuddin? I feel you really have some explaining to do as your recent actions seem contradictory to your previous beliefs and teachings. It seems a little ill-willed and malicious.

Hope your health is improving,

Warm wishes,

Zainub Mansoor bhai.

Karachi, Pakistan

Is Teyzoon Las Vegas Wala Still a Dawoodi Bohra?

What Happens in Vegas Should Stay in Vegas, No? What say you, Mr. Qutbuddin?

Dear Mr. Qutbuddin,

     You, your eminent children, your followers, and especially the progressive Dawoodi Bohras who openly gave gaali to Burhanuddin Moula RA on their website, have held Teyzoon the LasVegaswala in high esteem and continually placed him on a pedestal for ‘exposing’ the alleged conspiracy you say was going on against you for so many years. First of all, in many places you have stated, like in Nairobi many years ago when you fell from grace, that Imamuz Zaman directly supported you. So if you truly believed that then how could there have been an ongoing conspiracy for so many years? Wouldn’t divine providence have silenced your enemies some how? Anyhow, one thing is for sure – Teyzoon, your glorious follower, was never silenced and continued to blurt things he didn’t understand nor did he have the expertise to comment upon.

I am referring to what your hardcore followers have continuously mentioned on this site and elsewhere about Teyzoon’s Zahirbatin.org website. They maintain that it is some kind of smoking gun and the mastermind of this website, Teyzoon, is some kind of holy saint. I would like to send this letter to you to understand why you have continued this incorrect assumption and espoused Teyzoon. Isn’t it a well-known fact that there are many levels of knowledge in Dawoodi Bohra culture? I read in the comments here on this website that the level of knowledge that Mr. Teyzoon blurted and broadcasted all over the internet were at such a high level of knowledge, for which at the beginning of every class of this type of knowledge a strict oath is taken in which one promises that he will keep what he learns a secret and only reveal it to those he is charged to reveal it to. You’re not even suppose to reveal one word of what you learn – I believe. If he had questions about it I don’t think Google would have helped in answering them so broadcasting it on the internet seems malicious and latent with malintent. Furthermore, my grandfather told me that one who breaks this oath invokes the wrath of Allah and all his angels and their really isn’t a stricter oath than this? His website, the Zahir batin, is the epitome of such a breach of that oath. Yet, you and your followers still rave about it as some kind of magnificent fire-breathing dragon when in reality it is simply a red herring in every sense. Why so?

So my question to you is, Mr. Qutbuddin, you have made Teyzoon the martyr of your cause and used him to give him a sense of importance because he lacked any serious attention within his former family and religion, but is there any proof that he is still a Dawoodi Bohra after his breaching of the oath mentioned above? People have said how Burhanuddin Moula RA was hurt by him for making such a website and disclosing the secret knowledge he was charged to withhold and safeguard, but is there any proof that after breaking his oath that he reentered Dawat again. While we know he is a Qutbi cult follower, the question is was he ever a Dawoodi Bohra again after breaking his oath or did he come straight to the Qutbi Dawat? Did he give another oath of allegiance after he breached his original one? It seems like many people like this Teyzoon, your martyrs, are at the forefront of your religious cult and you have monopolized on their confusion. This in itself is very weird isn’t it, Mr. Qutbuddin. I was wondering if you cared to comment since Mr. Teyzoon is now part of the hierarchy of your congregation?

Good Day to You,

Yusuf Sulaymanjee,

Kenya

Your Self Preservation VS. the Sirat of Moulana Ali AS?

Site of the Battle of Khandaq Near Medina – Source Wikipedia commons

Map delineating the area where the Battle of Khandaq took place outside of Medina. The green line indicates the trench.

Dear Mr. Qutbuddin,

You have openly alleged that for the three years following the mild stroke of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA that his entire family, especially his own Shehzadas, had taken advantage of his medical condition to basically lay waste to everything he had sown and reaped in the Dawat for the last fifty years as the 52nd Dai of the Dawoodi Bohra community. During this time, if you believe it to be true since you have purported this on your Fatemidawat.com, not you or one member of your family or followers stood and tried to support Burhanuddin Moula RA. No one rose to try and rectify what you and your eminent learned children have considered a critical moment in Dawat. You have maintained that you did this for the preservation of yourself, and your children said in a press conference that you were silent because you hoped that Syedna’s health would get better. But in other places you have said that Syedna was so ill and his family, for lack of a better word, masqueraded Burhanuddin Moula RA and literally brandished him around to try and falsely demonstrate that Nass was done on Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. I hope you do understand how this allegation, in itself, is so very offensive to every Dawoodi Bohra, although it has become a fundamental belief in establishing the legitimacy of your Qutbi Dawat. In fact, you say this deception and chicanery went on for three years and you labeled it as something like ‘drama baazi’ on your official website Fatemidawat.com. You said that the reason for your silence and inaction to protect Burhanuddin Moula RA was because he had told you not to reveal to anyone that nass was done on you until the ‘right time’ because had you done so before his demise – your life would be in danger. In other words, your silence, your retreat, your decision not to help Burhanudidn Moula RA while his children were doing this was because of your need for your own self-preservation. You have quoted Marhoom Mukasir Saheb as saying “talwaar chali jaate,” etc. With all of your exuberant claims, the fact that 1 million Dawoodi Bohras have been led astray because of your alleged secret and self preservation is inconsequential to you. The fact that Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin’s RA legacy of preparing so many nufus for Imamuz Zaman’s Zuhur is now in shambles because only the 300 people or so who follow you remain as the only true believers, means nothing in comparison to your own life. This defeats logic on its own terms – but okay – let’s say you’re right for a brief second. Let’s say you did all of this to preserve your own life. You didn’t come to the janazah because of the safety of your life. You led one million people astray because of an alleged secret which was kept to protect your life.

The action of self-preservation at the detriment of Haq na Sahib and the well-being of the nufus of Mumineen makes little sense logically and theologically. It is uncharacteristic of someone who would claim to be Moulana Ali’s Dai. Here is a breakdown of what I am trying to say.

• When Shaikhun Najdi got members of the Quraish to come and assassinate Rasullullah SAW while he slept, it was Moulana Ali AS who slept in his bed in his place. He thought of Rasullullah SAW and not his own self-preservation at the time and Ameerul Mumineen has said that this incident was one of the seven of his greatest trials in his life.
• In the Battle of Uhud, Rasullullah SAW suffered many losses and he himself was wounded on the battlefield. When the Muslimeen thought they had won, the army dispersed and went to collect the war booty. Rasullullah SAW was left alone and the disbelievers returned and then lead an attack on Rasullullah SAW. During that time, Moulana Ali stayed and said that he would protect Rasullullah SAW. Rasullullah SAW told Moulana Ali to also go and leave- and in reply he said, “Shall I become a kafir after bringing Islam?” Moulana Ali SA defeated the enemies and did not leave Rasullullah alone, an act of such bravery and loyalty that the riwaayats say that Jibra’il came from the skies and said, “This is the true meaning of loyalty,” and “There is no fata (young man) like Ali.” May I remind you – you have alleged that the title of fata also belongs to you.
• Another example – during the Battle of Khandaq, ‘Amr bin Abde Wadd crossed the khandaq dug to protect the people of Medina in which the Muslimeen were quite worried of what would happen next and if they might lose the battle. Burhanuddin Moula RA always called this event “a critical moment” in Islam because ‘Amr bin Abde Wadd was such a fierce warrior and enemy. At that time again, when everyone was worried about their own self-preservation, it was Moulana Ali who stood and said that I will go and fight him. He protected Rasullullah even though it meant his life was in danger. There were others present there at that time who decided not to go and fight ‘Amr bin Abdewadd during this ‘critical moment’ and decided to indulge in their own self-preservation. We all know who they are and there is no need for me to mention that here and on which side of the analogy you fall. I am just not understanding your actions because I for one, would never let my Moula suffer for the thought of my own self-preservation. However, according to your own testimony and allegations against Burhanuddin Moula’s RA family this is exactly what you have done.
• There are not just examples of Moulana Ali which exist- countless Hudood of Dawat sacrificed themselves for Haq na Sahib. For example, Syedi Feerkhan Shujauddin went to the Qayd Khana with Syedna Qutbuddin Shahid RA even though doing so might cause him harm or even death. There was eminent danger there too, no? How about Syedi Musanjee bin Taaj, from my own watan of Baroda. He was put in burning oil while he was protecting his Dai. The first thought of Mumineen has always been to protect Sahib uz Zaman. This is our history and this is our tradition. These are our natural feelings as a community – Moula par fida thawu – not just in words but in reality. It is considered an honor. You might say that your actions were for the preservation of the nufus of Mumineen through your own preservation. However, how does the loss of a million followers equate that? It does not make any sense, Mr. Qutbuddin.

So in light of these well-known historical events recording Moulana Ali’s protection of Rasullullah SAW, I want to ask you, Mr. Qutbuddin, whose Dai are you? Why did you let Moula suffer so much if indeed you really believe what you have said officially on your website and elsewhere? Would anyone look at your actions and say that you are truly Moulana Ali’s Dai? I think we all deserve an explanation of what was going in your head during this time since you are claiming to be the Fatemi Dai. What does fidaayat actually mean in your ideologies? You said in your Ashura sermon this year that you are the ‘sacrifice of Imamuz Zaman.’ How so, if you weren’t even willing to sacrifice yourself for Burhanuddin Moula in his critical moment while his children supposedly did what you openly have alleged. Please answer soon as I think this is very fundamental to the veracity of all your claims.

Yours truly,

Alefiya Ujjainwala

Mandsaur, UP.