The Height Of Qutbi Hypocrisy

A Letter From The Royal Qutbi Prince, Taher bin Khuzaima Qutbuddin of Bakersfield
A Letter From The Royal Qutbi Prince, Taher bin Khuzaima Qutbuddin of Bakersfield

Dear Mr. Qutbuddin,

I hope you are doing well. I was compelled to send in this letter to you after some of the comments which have been posted on this website by your diehard followers. My sincere query to you is regarding a letter which was supposedly written by your eldest son Taher who is currently residing in Bakersfield and often appears on your website where his waez is relayed from his living room because it is easier for most of your followers to understand him since it is difficult to follow what you say in your current medical condition. I understand this choice of yours to put Taher in the limelight and try to garner support for him as he very well may be your successor and since your health may not be what it use to be. But what I don’t understand is that it seems that Taher has interpreted a different ideology from you some years back that is different than what was purported on the Fatemi Dawat website. I will point out what I am trying to say in the following –

  • The letter is almost 13 years old and has excerpts from a sabak you gave on the ‘urs of Syedna Tayib Zainuddin.
  • The main point of the letter is that you say that in Zuhoor the ritual of proskynesis was given to Imam and so in satr it should also be given to Dai considering the maqam in which Imamuz Zaman has placed him.
  • You go on to say (according to Prince Taher) that while it is necessary to accept and honor the positions below the Dai (Mazoon and Mukasir), the positions which the Dai has established, the ritual of proskynesis should only be done for the Dai.
  • You then say that if someone hurls obscenities at the Dai, keeps enmity with him, then they will suffer ill-fortune. An enemy of the Dai cannot seek salvation from him and they will have the worse of punishments in the afterlife.
  • You also mention that it is an article of faith to do baraat with the enemies of the Dai (cut off communications with them)  and that walayat cannot be considered complete unless you have done baraat.

So, Mr. Qutbuddin, what I don’t understand is that throughout your career as the Mazoon your children openly performed the ritual of proskynesis to you. Aqa Moula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA put a stop to this amal and it was no longer allowed – this is a known fact. In fact, this is exactly why Prince Taher wrote this letter – to ensure that he affirmed that ideology and concurred that one is not allowed to offer proskynesis to the mazoon and it is an amal reserved solely for the Dai. This much is said in the letter – that Mazoon and Mukasir should be respected and honored but not given sajdo.

Therefore, if you maintained that this amal could only be performed for the Dai, then why were you allowing it to be done for you? I have seen your children and diwaans performing this amal for you in Karachi many times.  Secondly, if you somehow maintain that you were next in line to be Dai and that is why you allowed this amal for yourself, you have said many times on your website and elsewhere that your private nass without witnesses was suppose to remain a secret and no one was suppose to know because ‘talwar chali jaate.’ I hope you do understand the contradiction in your actions and statements. If you were Burhanuddin Moula’s RA mansoos then he surely would have indicated that we perform this amal for you publicly for Mumineen. He never has once told Mumineen to do this in any bayan  – ever.

If it was suppose to be a secret it should have only been done in private.  I saw you accepting this amal to be done to you many times in Karachi and elsewhere, almost as if it was being forced. Therefore, it seems to me that you were doing this amal openly on your own and this is why there was a stop put to it. Otherwise, why would something right be stopped? Furthermore, the fact that Taher Qutbuddin wrote this letter is further proof that he had to openly state that  improper protocol being followed with the amal. Obviously if you were only suppose to announce that you were the mansoos at the right time, as you have maintained, you were announcing it all these years with your amal in public and that is contradictory to what you have been saying all along about keeping it a secret. Why such a blatant contradiction of statements? Why didn’t Burhanuddin Moula RA ever tell us to perform this amal for you if you were truly his mansoos? And if you were keeping the so called nass a secret, logic mandates that you would never have allowed your children and close relatives to do this in public. In fact, when people asked them they would maintain that they were just kissing the ground at your feet which was not sajdo but another amal. Were they lying at the time? Did you tell them to lie?

Secondly, after articulating that it is an article of the faith to not hurl obscenities or blasphemous statements at the Dai, why was this the first amal that you did when Burhanuddin Moula RA passed away. You opened a website that hurled blasphemous statements and obscenities at the 53rd Dai Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. Okay – lets say that you personally didn’t accept Moula TUS as the Dai. But you also didn’t do anything for three years after all Dawoodi Bohras had time to accept Mufaddal Moula TUS after nass was done on him. So you let everyone accept him as the Dai in their hearts, then after Burhanuddin Moula’s RA wafaat you came out and did dushmani and hurled obscenities such as calling him a wahabi, misogynist anti-woman suppressor, etc. etc. You knew what this would mean to the community and the 99.5 % of Dawoodi Bohras and what repercussions it would have. But you still chose to do it anyways. This is what I call fitnat because you must have anticipated the reaction of the Dawoodi Bohra community when you hurled insults at the 53rd Dai Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS openly all over the internet during the funeral procession and subsequent memorial services.

Then when baraat was done to you – according to the tenets of the faith which you uphold in the letter above – you ran to the newspapers to display what a wrong act it was and how it was unfair to you and your handful of followers. You demonstrated to your followers that the Dawoodi Bohras were acting irrationally and that the fact that they did baraat of you was such a wrong action. However, in this letter of Taher you have clearly stated that doing baraat with people who display enmity and hurl obscenities to the Dai is an article of faith. So I guess the question is why, Mr. Qutbuddin? I feel you really have some explaining to do as your recent actions seem contradictory to your previous beliefs and teachings. It seems a little ill-willed and malicious.

Hope your health is improving,

Warm wishes,

Zainub Mansoor bhai.

Karachi, Pakistan

26 thoughts on “The Height Of Qutbi Hypocrisy

  1. No it does not. I read that article it does not even make sense. If we SUPPOSE that kq was nt called upon by shezadas, the news abt the stroke was out in open, kq could have called and enquired, or directly gone to london and seen Maula ra’s health. Please go and ask him what did stop him from doing so was it his EGO of nobody personally calling him and informing him or was it lack of MOHABBAT tat stopped him frm doing so. Is he such a big COWARD tat he had to run away even frm raudat tahera.
    Where here I being an adna mumin I wouldnt fear my life and give it away at an eyes blink for My Maula is khuzema such a coward that he had to run all the time when according to him Maula ra was under seige. This one point is enuf for khuzema to loose all the respect frm all the mumineen. I pity u and him.

    Like

  2. Sajda is haram to any one apart of Allah. All of u are in shirk. Gunahe kabeera. Astagfirullah. Moula or aqa is only Allah.
    May Allah guide u to islam. Ameen

    Like

      • I think Feroza, however bigoted she might appear, has the right to express her point. She has a very rigid interpretation of Islam that is taught to her and she is bluntly saying things without knowing the full extent of contextualization. Her statement is no different than a right wing European saying that the massacres in Paris are the faults of all Muslims because according to her, all Muslims have , or should adhere to, one single ideology.

        Like

  3. Japi to baba ramdev taking lesson on yoga in taziyat meeting
    waaz of rss pracharak in saifee masjid
    welcome to defination of
    new islam

    Like

  4. The biggest contradiction to Taizoons post is that Syedna Burhanuddin RA himself ordered Dr. Moiz bs to make sure that everyone was made aware of the nass (see:Taqreer of Abdulqadir bs and Nass A/V). Why would any Shehzada Saheb consult the Mazoon or Mukasir if the Dai himself has commanded an action?
    Also a simple argument for Mumineen (I do not intend to debate this, just a good thought i overheard): We do not give sajda to the kaaba (which is made of simple stone) but instead through it give Sajda to Allah. According to our beliefs our Moula is our Kaaba and we give sajda to Allah through him. There is no confusion to the oneness of Allah and thus no shirk.

    Like

  5. why any shezada saheb need to consult nass confered to dawedaar .who himself mentioned it in gurratul masajid when shz qaidjohar bs audio was replayed
    i think this guy belief is that this kq was higher then dai ?

    Like

  6. I think Mr firoz doesn’t pray quran bcoz in quran it is mentioned tht god has ordered every one to do sajda for nabi Adam a.s but iblees refused n gather in his shaitaan toli.

    Like

  7. The best part:
    When one types “Dawedaar” in Google search engine it directs one to many pages but at the end is Khuzaima Qutbuddin. Total LOL, even Google is calling you Dawedaar

    But, when types ‘Mufaddal Saifuddin’ in the Google search engine, even Wikipedia shows Him as the Dai of Dawoodi Bohra Community.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Taizoon claims that as soon as he launched the zahir/batin website, “muffadalis” came to hassle him.

    1. There is no one as “Mufaddalis”
    2. There have been only Mumineen and there will be only MUMINEEN. You cults name yourself differently
    3. Taizoon has forever been delusional and paranoid, when he got a call that Mukasir e Dawat wanted to talk to him, he should have submitted to the rutba and heard him.
    4. Then he was told that Burhanuddin Moula no paigam che, ae pan na sunu. How can one ignore a message from his Moula!
    In his heart, Taizoon always knew he was wrong in posting contests of aala kitab but still did it and never repented his actions and he allegates Bhaisahebs not being “Nadim mustagfir”

    What about you Mr. Taizoon? Are you a Nadim mustagfir? Did you do istigfaar and seek forgiveness from Burhanuddin Moula?

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Taizoon, you claim to be a diehard US citizen and flaunt that around so did you know that it is a crime to publish phone call without consent of other parties who you are talking to?

    Your betrayed your own sister Naama bensab and your own cousins and published the conversation to every Tom, Dick and Harry without the ladies’ consent. I still have the conversation and am sending that to the criminal department.

    Here’s the Law:

    “California Wiretapping Law

    California’s wiretapping law is a “two-party consent” law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation. See Cal. Penal Code § 632. The statute applies to “confidential communications” — i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).”

    Taizoon you are a fraud and liar of first grade.

    Like

  10. ghair_saleh, if you want to play the semantics games then ask your fake dai KQ and his pilla TB to stop using the term “aaraabi” as well. The term endearingly used by Rasulallah (S. A. W.) and Ali and is peppered throughout our history and books. Your half-baked Americanized minds may find that term offensive as well.

    Like

  11. I think the Contract of the Qutbis with Mumbai Mirror has finished.. Mumbai Mirror confirms the next Day as Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin and KQ as Claimant

    Like

  12. Skq Will apear as plaintfs on 27 April and prove that he is true 53 dai mutlaq.
    If ms bs has guts to apear as defendnt in court and personally apear for cross

    Like

    • KQ is cmng to the court out compulsion. He has filed the case and sadly he has to. SYEDNA MUFADDAL SAIFUDDIN TUS doesnt need to prove to anybody. Well we know whn kq will come to court he will be scrwd royally. Wait and watch.

      Like

      • Just one ?
        Can nass be retract back
        can we have conwell hospital records in court as document to prove state of health

        Like

      • 2 mumines died in Karachi my condolence to their family
        official message for celebration for returns of kids and death in Karachi
        wow

        Like

Leave a comment