I Call His Highness Prince Husain Qutbuddin To Mubahalah!

pic_29207_1_full

His Royal Highness the Prince Husain Qutbuddin, the founder and spokesperson of Fatemidawat.com, sporting a black trouser and black striped shirt with a Dawoodi Bohra traditional cap known as the topi. He is holding the pen his father blessed for him and prayed upon. In Fatimi fiqh, white was the color of the Fatimiyeen and black was considered the official color of the Banul Abbas. The contrast between black and white of Husain Qutbuddin is very stunning and he looks dashing in both outfits (see below).

Screen Shot 2014-12-01 at 12.54.55 PM

His Highness Prince Dr. Husain Qutbuddin, a renowned academic, wearing white and preaching to the Qutbi Bohras and invoking mubahala.

Dear Mr. Qutbuddin,

      I am officially calling your son, His Royal Highness Prince Dr. Husain Qutbuddin to mubahala. In a You Tube video shortly after the demise of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA (while the community was still in mourning), you and later your beloved son, Husain Qutbuddin, invoked mubahala, to call the Dawoodi Bohras (your former community) to a debate about who was the correct Syedna (although historically this has no precedence in intercommunal affairs and originated between Muslims and Christians.) The history behind this word goes back to the time of the prophet Muhammad Rasullullah SAW. The word mubahala refers to an ayat in the Qur’an 3:61-62 which translates as,

“This revelation, and this wise admonition, we recite to you. Jesus is like Adam in the sight of God. He created Him of dust and said to Him ‘Be,’ and He was. This is the truth from your Lord; therefore, do not doubt it. To those who dispute with you concerning Jesus after the knowledge ye have received, say, ‘Come let us gather our sons and your sons, our wives and your wives, our people and your people. We will pray together and call down the curse of God (la’nat) on the ones who lie.”

I think your son, Prince Husain Qutbuddin, has memorized the Qur’an so you and he should be well aware of the historical origins of this ayat. What occurred is that in 631, a Christian delegation from Najran which consisted of seventy members came to Medina to debate religion with Rasullullah SAW. The debate, as is evident from the ayat above, was related to the divine nature of Jesus Christ and the belief that Islam was the only one true religion. Both parties got a little charged in the debate and so the Prophet Muhammad recited the ayat above and called the Christians of Najran to come the next day on the 15th of January 631. The calling to the mubahala included men (the sons), womenfolk (wives), and members of both communities. The point of the invocation was so that the disputing parties, Muslims and Christians, could invoke Khuda Taala to pray la’nat and curse the party who was not correct. Therefore, the devil is in the details. Calling mubahala is a serious matter in Islam and results in la’nat. Dr. Husain Qutbuddin and most of your followers have maintained that they have taken the moral high ground and refrained from la’nat and such deeming it an archaic practice. Yet you and your son, His Highness, called to pray la’nat on the Dawoodi Bohra establishment and hierarchy in order to purport you, Mr. Khuzeima Qutbuddin, as the head of the community with your continuous calls to mubahala. Besides the theological problems in calling other Muslims to such a debate, as this was an intracommunal matter, it also is very odd that you chose to do this while everyone was mourning the loss of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. Mubahala, according to the Quran, includes men from both sides, women from both sides, and followers from both sides as mentioned above. Therefore, you were ready to start a debate and pray la’nat on the 99.89 % of Dawoodi Bohras who don’t follow Mr. Qutbuddin (I assume you believe you are on the correct side) while they had just lost their spiritual father. Without saying too much, I hope you do understand the serious moral dilemma that this represents.

In any case, let us put that in the past. Today, I also invoke mubahala, and call your learned and eminent son, Husain Qutbuddin to mubahala as is according to your own Qutbi Bohra practices. I also invoke your  sons and our sons, your womenfolk and our womenfolk, your people and our people, to debate on this website to see who is right. I am sure that you will answer the call to mubahala now that I have invoked you.

Allah bless you all,

Yours truly,

Farazdaq

 (note to readers: please forward to info@fatemidawat.com so it might reach His Highness Prince Husain Qutbuddin and to other readers via social apps so that the call to mubahila is answered by the prince.)

11 thoughts on “I Call His Highness Prince Husain Qutbuddin To Mubahalah!

  1. Dear So and So concerned
    Syedna Qutbuddin called for muhaballah ( discussion) only.
    You refer to the situation in the Quran which was between our prophet and the Christians
    Moulana Qutbuddin just wanted to have a debate/ discussion on the topic of succession
    If he wanted to pray lanat he could have done so as it is ironically behind done continuously by Shz Mufaddalbs and his group. It is well to remember that Laanat if it is done on a non deserving person it boomerangs on the doer. I hope the prayers of Laanat are aware of it
    Take care and fear God
    Tasneem

    Like

    • Dear Tasneem,
      Your Master, Mr. Qutbuddin didn’t call for ‘debate.’ He called specifically for Mubahala which only has one religious meaning and I assume that since he claims that he is the head of the Dawoodi Bohra Muslim religion this is only what he meant. Debate has other words in Arabic which he could have uses. And this idea was reiterated by his son, his highness Dr. Husain Qutbuddin who also emphasized that no one came to his call to Mubahala. So it might be easy for you to dismiss their actions because you believe that he has claimed the moral high ground – but unfortunately, it doesn’t seem that way. Who calls someone to a debate during a funeral anyway? That kind of conduct is not Godly in any way whatsoever and I don’t judge you for believing in someone like that but I personally don’t think its right to say that someone can aim to claim the moral high ground and say that they are righteous while creating such a schismatic aura around the demise of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. Besides giving everyone something extra to grieve about what good did it do? It just stirred up everyone. When 98.5% of people don’t agree with you, you should give yourself the chance to go over all the events that were told to you and see if they are correct. If you do – that’s great – but don’t go around telling people to fear God and don’t presume that you even know the meaning of la’nat. You have to remember that your religious leader came out on the internet and called the 53rd Dai Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS many things – i.e. usurper, wahabi preaching, unjust etc. I think la’nat is a step down than the name calling the Qutbis have done. You’re in no right at all – so please don’t pretend that your group hasn’t said anything. Where is the godfearing in all the stuff that they have put up on the internet? Is that okay? You’re hypocrisy is remarkable.
      Take care and you fear God, Tasneem.

      All best,

      Khuzeima

      Like

    • Dear tasneem
      You have mentioned the Qur’anic Aayat about mabahala and mentioned about Rasoolullah and Christians.
      I assume that you have been knowing about the full incident between Rasoolullah and Christians.
      The Christian leaders came to Rasoolullah to debate about religious principles. Allah taala then revealed the mubahala Aayat that states “O Disbelievers! We bring our men women, chilseen and ourselves, and you bring your men, women, children and yourselves then WE PRAY TO ALLAH AND IMPOSE LAANAT ON THE FALSE TELLERS”

      The word Mubahala means to pray upon each other, it does not mean debate or similar.

      So,
      This is a call to pray upon each other and Allah will reveal the truth……

      Like

  2. Dear Tasneem
    Plz contact Mr husain and tell him to answer at least one question with substantial evidence from Dawat kutub .
    He has not refuted a single argument on the following sites and calling maula for mubahala.
    He cannot answer a single question posed on
    Believesyednaqutbuddin.com or qutbibohras.blogspot.in or this blog and talking of mubahalah
    Truly empty vessels make more noise

    Like

    • Dear Tasneem,
      I have a better idea. Don’t indulge in fantastical ideas to prove an unworthy cause. Come back to the people who care about you and don’t stay with those that are just using your devotion to reinforce their own selfish motives.

      Like

  3. Curious that you give out the email address yet want someone else to forward your message? Why not email it to them directly? Unlike the Kothar, I am sure they won’t come hounding you and you may even get a reply.

    Like

  4. It was a question to the author as he has given an email address to forward his message to. So I am asking why did he not send it himself/herself?

    Like

Leave a comment